Babylon 10 Poll

We could come to a compromise. I have nothing against multicultural :grin:
What about ‘Swerenchenglish’? :joy: I think I could cope with that :rofl:

My personal take is things change… As much as being stable is important, I feel like migrating through breaking changes isn’t really that big of a deal as long as the documentation is good… and babylonJS’ documentation is great! So I feel like avoiding breaking changing until absolutely necessary would be well within reason.

Overall, my vote would be Yes, and allow breaking changes going forward IF needed. :slight_smile:

1 Like

I am fully aligned with the goal of improving the size and imports. Also becoming WebGPU centric is in my opinion a fair justification for breaking changes.

After all those years, I trust in the stability of the framework. A one off every 10 years is much better than most projects in our industry. If it makes Babylon better I fully support it :smiley:

4 Likes