Does CESM use a logarithmic function?
logarithmic ：
exponential:
I think this should have the same effect.
Hello! You can see the functions used to compute ESM and CESM in shadowsFragmentFunctions.fx:
- ESM :
float esm = 1.0 - clamp(exp(min(87., depthScale * shadowPixelDepth)) * shadowMapSample, 0., 1. - darkness); - CESM:
float esm = clamp(exp(min(87., -depthScale * (shadowPixelDepth - shadowMapSample))), darkness, 1.);
They look pretty similar to one another at a glance, but once you plot the values according to the shadowMapSample value, they look pretty different (for simplicity, I substituted depthScale and shadowPixelDepth for 1.0, and darkness for 0.0):
ESM is f1, CESM is f2. The link to the plots is here: Graphtoy
@sebavan can complement with anything I missed 
5 Likes
I’m a little confused.
ESM core formula：
But we use this formula:
ESM : float esm = 1.0 - clamp(exp(min(87., depthScale * shadowPixelDepth)) * shadowMapSample, 0., 1. - darkness);
It make the shadowMapSample without exp.Why can we omit the exponent calculation?
Seb will be the best person to answer but he’s out of office for a few days so he may take a bit to respond 
1 Like
Okay~Thanks!
1 Like
No, the shadowMapSample is generated with the exp, see:
As explained in this thread, we are doing e^(-c*(z-d)) and not e^(-c*(d-z)), that’s why we need to do visibility=1-e^(-c*(z-d)) in the end.
If you want to use the formula from the original paper (which are the ones you quote), you should use CESM and not ESM in Babylon.js.
3 Likes