Node with -1 z scale parent,and decompose with preserveScalingNode.PG:
Node withouth parent,and decompose with preserveScalingNode.PG:
Node with -1 z scale parent,and decompose with preserveScalingNode.PG:
Node withouth parent,and decompose with preserveScalingNode.PG:
I did not forget you and your issues. It’s still on my todo list. Thanks for being patient
Hi,Cedric .Is this caused by the same reason?
This problem caused by matrix decompose,i don’t know if it caused by the same reason with scaleGizmo.
Yes, I think it is. Somewhere a link is not done with preservescaling and an operation goes wrong.
Actually, in your PGs, child
is used as parameter for preserveScalingNode
. In both PG, child scaling is [1,1,1], if group
is used instead, then Euler angles are correct.
Yes,but why i set child node as preserveScaling node.Its euler angles is not correct.
I think that preserveScaling node just change the scale sign.Euler angles shoule not be [0, 0, 0].
If we want the preserve the current node scaling sign,we should consider its parents.Here is my solution.